<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Live Writer Is Great, But Not for Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lifeofbaz.com/technology/windows-live-writer-great/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.LifeOfBaz.com/technology/windows-live-writer-great/</link>
	<description>Walk A Mile In My Shoes - Technology, Web Design, Saving Money</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave J. (Scoop0901)</title>
		<link>http://www.LifeOfBaz.com/technology/windows-live-writer-great/#comment-2809</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave J. (Scoop0901)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lifeofbaz.com/blog/windows-live-writer-great/#comment-2809</guid>
		<description>If you make a post with WLW, you will see all the plugins that function within WP will still make their magic happen on posts generated from WLW.

There is a catch: if you use plugins that require a hands-on approach at the time of creating, that's simple to do. Simply write your post offline using WLW, publish it, then, in WLW, pull it up in the WP editor, add any coding (i.e., keywords or whatever you need to, based on those plugins), and save the post. Voila! No one knows WLW was used and everything looks identical.

WLW is NOT a replacement for WP.  It is a writing platform only.  It is not intended to replace WP in any way.  WP requires so many plugins to make up for things no included in the WordPress core, some of which should be in the core, other stuff is merely supplemental.  That's another reason why WLW doesn't need tons of plugins, though there are around 100 or so plugins available, allowing you to do all sorts of cool tricks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:right; margin-left:10px; display:block; background: none;; width:50px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://blog.scoop0901.net/'><img alt='' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/98d518a3dd78dfd5854e9c031aff15f8?s=50&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fuse.perl.org%2Fimages%2Fpix.gif&amp;r=PG' class='avatar avatar-50' height='50' width='50' /></a></span>If you make a post with WLW, you will see all the plugins that function within WP will still make their magic happen on posts generated from WLW.</p>
<p>There is a catch: if you use plugins that require a hands-on approach at the time of creating, that&#8217;s simple to do. Simply write your post offline using WLW, publish it, then, in WLW, pull it up in the WP editor, add any coding (i.e., keywords or whatever you need to, based on those plugins), and save the post. Voila! No one knows WLW was used and everything looks identical.</p>
<p>WLW is NOT a replacement for WP.  It is a writing platform only.  It is not intended to replace WP in any way.  WP requires so many plugins to make up for things no included in the WordPress core, some of which should be in the core, other stuff is merely supplemental.  That&#8217;s another reason why WLW doesn&#8217;t need tons of plugins, though there are around 100 or so plugins available, allowing you to do all sorts of cool tricks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
